safibta
|
intermittent fasting - 2019-09-02 (...
Star this Commitment
Week 52 of 52
safibta commits to:
I commit to stay true to what I state in the latest journal entry under the present Stickk commitment
52
0
No more reports due
|
My Commitment Journal
 safibta
December 9, 2019, 11:32 PM
|
|
|
The following commitment is considered in the present stickk commitment: - Outside the open time interval A contained within any 24 hour period and defined as (1600,2400) in KST, I must not voluntarily pass, through my oral cavity, more than exactly 0 calories of blueberries in solid or liquid form, and prepared at any time at all at any location at all, in any duration consisting of 60 consecutive minutes contained in the interval A - exceptions to this commitment are as follows: --- I tear a usable 2k South Korean Won note into three pieces, which allows a window of 30 minute since the first piece is torn --- when I am not in South Korea at any time within 20 hours before an interval A --- when I am in a meeting or in a date with one or more people --- calories in any drink which is ordinarily known as any of the following: ----- coffee ----- lemonade ----- lemon tea ----- joshanda ----- yakhni --- calories in any foods which are ordinarily known as any of the following terms: ----- peas ----- protein powder ----- protein powder mixed with water ----- fish ----- green beans ----- chicken Notes applicable to the present journal entry: - The present commitment can be modified by updating the present journal entry with a new journal entry. Notice period clause: Changes take effect exactly 1 hour after the update time of the journal entry. In other words, the notice period for the present stick commitment is 1 hour. - Upon violation of the present stickk commitment, the present stickk commitment shall become void for 3 hours starting the second that immediately after the event of the incumbent violation instance is initiated. Starting the second immediately after these 3 hours are passed and until further notice, the present stickk commitment shall hold. - note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period and do so before the due time of the incurring penalty defined in the present journal entry in the considered instance. --- this definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. - Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period. --- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole. --- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. --- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”) - Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment. - Relaxation clause: number of relaxation periods of any duration allowed for the present stick commitment is zero. |
|
|
safibta
September 28, 2019, 5:50 PM
|
|
|
The following commitment is considered in the present stickk commitment: - Outside the open time interval A contained within any 24 hour period and defined as (0630,1200)∪(1600,2100) in KST, I must not voluntarily pass, through my oral cavity, more than exactly 0 calories in solid or liquid form, and prepared at any time at all at any location at all, in any duration consisting of 60 consecutive minutes contained in the interval A - exceptions to this commitment are as follows: --- I tear a usable 2k South Korean Won note into three pieces, which allows a window of 30 minute since the first piece is torn --- when I am not in South Korea at any time within 20 hours before an interval A --- when I am in a meeting or in a date with one or more people --- calories in any drink which is ordinarily known as any of the following: ----- coffee ----- lemonade ----- lemon tea ----- joshanda ----- yakhni --- calories in any foods which are ordinarily known as any of the following terms: ----- peas ----- protein powder ----- protein powder mixed with water ----- fish ----- green beans ----- chicken Notes applicable to the present journal entry: - The present commitment can be modified by updating the present journal entry with a new journal entry. Notice period clause: Changes take effect exactly 1 hour after the update time of the journal entry. In other words, the notice period for the present stick commitment is 1 hour. - Upon violation of the present stickk commitment, the present stickk commitment shall become void for 3 hours starting the second that immediately after the event of the incumbent violation instance is initiated. Starting the second immediately after these 3 hours are passed and until further notice, the present stickk commitment shall hold. - note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period and do so before the due time of the incurring penalty defined in the present journal entry in the considered instance. --- this definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. - Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period. --- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole. --- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. --- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”) - Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment. - Relaxation clause: number of relaxation periods of any duration allowed for the present stick commitment is zero. |
|
|
safibta
September 24, 2019, 2:45 PM
|
|
|
The following commitment is considered in the present stickk commitment: - Outside the open time interval A contained within any 24 hour period and defined as (0630,1200)∪(1600,2000) in KST, I must not voluntarily pass, through my oral cavity, more than exactly 0 calories in solid or liquid form, and prepared at any time at all at any location at all, in any duration consisting of 60 consecutive minutes contained in the interval A - exceptions to this commitment are as follows: --- I tear a usable 2k South Korean Won note into three pieces, which allows a window of 30 minute since the first piece is torn --- when I am not in South Korea at any time within 20 hours before an interval A --- when I am in a meeting or in a date with one or more people --- calories in any drink which is ordinarily known as any of the following: ----- coffee ----- lemonade ----- lemon tea ----- joshanda ----- yakhni --- calories in any foods which are ordinarily known as any of the following terms: ----- peas ----- protein powder ----- protein powder mixed with water ----- fish ----- green beans ----- chicken Notes applicable to the present journal entry: - The present commitment can be modified by updating the present journal entry with a new journal entry. Notice period clause: Changes take effect exactly 1 hour after the update time of the journal entry. In other words, the notice period for the present stick commitment is 1 hour. - Upon violation of the present stickk commitment, the present stickk commitment shall become void for 3 hours starting the second that immediately after the event of the incumbent violation instance is initiated. Starting the second immediately after these 3 hours are passed and until further notice, the present stickk commitment shall hold. - note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period and do so before the due time of the incurring penalty defined in the present journal entry in the considered instance. --- this definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. - Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period. --- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole. --- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. --- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”) - Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment. - Relaxation clause: number of relaxation periods of any duration allowed for the present stick commitment is zero. |
|
|
safibta
September 21, 2019, 10:38 AM
|
|
|
The following commitment is considered in the present stickk commitment: - Outside the open time interval A contained within any 24 hour period and defined as (0630,1200)∪(1600,2000) in KST, I must not voluntarily pass, through my oral cavity, more than exactly 0 calories in solid or liquid form, and prepared at any time at all at any location at all, in any duration consisting of 60 consecutive minutes contained in the interval A - exceptions to this commitment are as follows: --- I tear a usable 2k South Korean Won note into three pieces, which allows a window of 30 minute since the first piece is torn --- when I am not in South Korea at any time within 20 hours before an interval A --- when I am in a meeting or in a date with one or more people --- calories in any drink which is ordinarily known as any of the following: ----- coffee ----- lemonade ----- lemon tea ----- joshanda ----- yakhni Notes applicable to the present journal entry: - The present commitment can be modified by updating the present journal entry with a new journal entry. Notice period clause: Changes take effect exactly 1 hour after the update time of the journal entry. In other words, the notice period for the present stick commitment is 1 hour. - Upon violation of the present stickk commitment, the present stickk commitment shall become void for 3 hours starting the second that immediately after the event of the incumbent violation instance is initiated. Starting the second immediately after these 3 hours are passed and until further notice, the present stickk commitment shall hold. - note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period and do so before the due time of the incurring penalty defined in the present journal entry in the considered instance. --- this definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. - Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold: --- I must end this definition with a period. --- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole. --- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole. --- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”) - Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment. - Relaxation clause: number of relaxation periods of any duration allowed for the present stick commitment is zero. |
|
This Commitment has no photos.
.
